US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 131 - 140 of 22,813
Allen v. Jefferson County Jail et al
as 1:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Allen
Defendant:
Jefferson County Jail and Sheriff Zena Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wesley v. Gonzales et al
as 5:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Kaiven Wesley
Defendant:
FNU Gonzales, FNU Elliott, Management Training Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Neal et al
as 5:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Franklin Taylor
Defendant:
Jeff Neal and Turn Key Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hancock v. Doe et al
as 4:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Anthony E Hancock
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Francis v. John Doe et al
as 6:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
John Francis
Defendant:
John Doe and Table Company in TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Smith
as 6:2024cv00088
Petitioner:
Richard James Johnson
Respondent:
Sheriff Larry R. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. Director
as 5:2024cv00034
Petitioner:
Kristopher Wilson
Respondent:
TDCJ-CID Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stewart v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2024cv00050
Petitioner:
Joshua Lynn Stewart
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kozikowski v. Skinner et al
as 4:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Richard Michael Kozikowski
Defendant:
Sheriff FNU Skinner, Collin County Detention Facility, Wellpath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
