US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 21,086
Keaton v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2022cv00329
Petitioner:
Adrian Aldon Keaton
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Muckleroy v. Davis et al
as 6:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
Rodney Muckleroy
Defendant:
Quade Davis, Sarah Fields, Tina McMullen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moses v. Edgeworth
as 4:2022cv00328
Plaintiff:
Robert Arthur Moses
Defendant:
Honorable Jennifer Edgeworth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oliphant v. Taylor et al
as 9:2022cv00066
Defendant:
John Doe, Chad Taylor, Anitra Lindley and others
Plaintiff:
Terrence Lavail Oliphant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hall v. Polk et al
as 9:2022cv00065
Plaintiff:
Maurice Deman Hall
Defendant:
Balden O Polk, Carlos Applewhite and Cristin L Boykin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. City of Paris Police Department et al
as 4:2022cv00323
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Moore
Defendant:
City of Paris Police Department, Officer Helms and Officer Wahlquist
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Landry v. Skinner
as 4:2022cv00324
Petitioner:
Norman J. Landry
Respondent:
James Skinner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Green v. Director, TDCJ
as 6:2022cv00147
Petitioner:
Bobby Kim Green
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gilbert v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2022cv00146
Petitioner:
Raymond Doyle Gilbert
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
