US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Cases 11 - 20 of 108,782
United States of America v. 2018 Dodge Ram 3500, VIN 3C63RRKL8JG292368
as 3:2024cv01068
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
2018 Dodge Ram 3500, VIN 3C63RRKL8JG292368
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property - Aircraft
Elizabeth v. WWEX Franchise Holdings, LLC
as 3:2024cv01066
Defendant:
WWEX Franchise Holdings LLC and Worldwide Express
Plaintiff:
Linda Elizabeth
Prime Minister of Russia Vladimir Putin v. Deco 969 et al
as 4:2024cv00388
Plaintiff:
Prime Minister of Russia Vladimir Putin and Lakeshia Edmond
Defendant:
Deco 969, Truist Bank, Haltom Jewelry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Krikie v. State of Texas et al
as 3:2024cv01054
Petitioner:
David Paul Krikie
Respondent:
State of Texas and Dallas County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Butler v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv01060
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Wayne Butler, Jr
Defendant:
Bryan Scott Lee, Brian Davenport, City of Cleburne Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Juarez v. Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2024cv00111
Petitioner:
Luis Jesus Juarez
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KBent. LLC v. First Co.
as 3:2024cv01061
Plaintiff:
KBent. LLC
Defendant:
First Co.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Flores v. USA
as 6:2024cv00029
Petitioner:
Romelia Flores
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Garcia-Dixon v. Nova Mud, Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Veronica Garcia-Dixon
Defendant:
Nova Mud, Inc. and Christian Clayton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
