Washington Other Statutes Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 321
Rough v. Chase Bank et al
as 2:2018cv01555
Defendant:
Sergei Chuchalin, Barclaycard, Chase Bank and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas H Rough
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Sofair v. Giga Watt Inc et al
as 2:2018cv00308
Defendant:
Giga Watt, Inc., GigaWatt Pte. Ltd., David Mattew Carlson and others
Plaintiff:
Refael Sofair
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Owen v. Hackett Law Firm LLC et al
as 3:2018cv05760
Plaintiff:
Ronald A Owen
Defendant:
Hackett Law Firm LLC, Ryan Hackett, Paula Stegemeier and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chelan County v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
as 2:2018cv00285
Plaintiff:
Chelan County
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma LP, John and Jane Does 1 through 100 and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Safadi v. Roe et al
as 2:2018cv01305
Defendant:
Mark Ferraz, James A. Pautler, Rory Hardy and others
Plaintiff:
Amar Safadi
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Tatari v. Safadi
as 2:2018cv01286
Defendant:
Amar Safadi
Plaintiff:
Aliya Tatari
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
The Makah Indian Tribe v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 3:2018cv05662
Defendant:
John and Jane Does 1 through 100, McKesson Corporation, Mallinckrodt, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
The Makah Indian Tribe
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Jefferson County v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 3:2018cv05661
Defendant:
John and Jane Does 1 through 100, McKesson Corporation, Mallinckrodt, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Jefferson County
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Smith et al v. Smith et al
as 3:2018cv05646
Defendant:
John Does 1-10 and Cheryl E Smith
Plaintiff:
Joanne Smith and Douglas Smith
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Whitman County v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
as 2:2018cv00252
Defendant:
John and Jane Does 1 through 100, McKesson Corporation, Mallinckrodt, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Whitman County
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
