US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 372
Routine Baseball LLC et al v. Zimmerman et al
as 2:2019cv01227
Plaintiff:
Routine Baseball LLC and Complex Solutions LLC
Defendant:
Kokomo Baseball LLC, Rock League Baseball LLC, SC Waukesha Inc and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
ROC Ventures LLC
3Rd Party Defendant:
Michael DeGrave
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Strong Microbials Inc v. Mann Lake Ltd
as 2:2019cv00904
Defendant:
Mann Lake Ltd. and Mann Lake Ltd
Plaintiff:
Strong Microbials, Inc. and Strong Microbials Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
304 North Adams Green Bay, LLC v. Macy's IP Holdings, LLC
as 1:2019cv00692
Defendant:
Macy's IP Holdings, LLC and Macys IP Holdings LLC
Plaintiff:
304 North Adams Green Bay, LLC and 304 North Adams Green Bay LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
SC Johnson & Son Inc v. Henkel Corporation
as 2:2019cv00375
Defendant:
Henkel Corporation
Plaintiff:
SC Johnson & Son Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Rice v. Reading For Education LLC
as 2:2019cv00245
Plaintiff:
Mark Rice
Defendant:
Reading For Education LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Australian Supplements Pty Ltd v. Landen et al
as 1:2019cv00091
Defendant:
Shelly Kay Landen, 123 Diet USA, LLC and 123 Diet USA LLC
Plaintiff:
Australian Supplements Pty Ltd
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Rice v. Butler
as 2:2019cv00071
Plaintiff:
Mark Rice
Defendant:
John P Butler
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Dronco GmbH v. Qingdao Bronco Rubber Co Ltd
as 2:2019cv00077
Plaintiff:
Dronco, GmbH and Dronco GmbH
Defendant:
Qingdao Bronco Rubber Co., Ltd. and Qingdao Bronco Rubber Co Ltd
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Rice v. Kickstarter PBC
as 2:2019cv00069
Plaintiff:
Mark Rice
Defendant:
Kickstarter PBC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Rice v. Indiegogo Inc
as 2:2019cv00070
Plaintiff:
Mark Rice
Defendant:
Indiegogo Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
