Cases 1 - 10 of 37,104
Barksdale v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 7:2024cv00649
Petitioner:
Donald Wayne Barksdale
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hodge v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00512
Petitioner:
Cordero L. Hodge
Respondent:
E. Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Mason v. Columbus County Detention Center
as 5:2024hc02168
Respondent:
Columbus County Detention Center
Petitioner:
Rashee Jvon Mason
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rodriguez v. Warden
as 1:2024cv05142
Petitioner:
Pedro Lazaro Rodriguez
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Alford v. Fox et al
as 9:2024cv05138
Respondent:
Marcus Rhods, George Debusk Jr., William Rudderow and others
Petitioner:
Billly L. Alford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Harris v. Chapman
as 3:2024cv00660
Respondent:
Tonya D. Chapman
Petitioner:
Samuel L. Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Washington v. Department of Corrections
as 7:2024cv00641
Petitioner:
Gene Everett Washington
Respondent:
Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bynum v. Holzapfel
as 5:2024cv00507
Respondent:
Mr. Holzapfel
Petitioner:
Malcolm Bynum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Butler v. Stephan
as 8:2024cv05141
Petitioner:
Lakiem Butler
Respondent:
Michael Stephan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kirby v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 1:2024cv01629
Respondent:
Virginia Commonwealth of
Petitioner:
Leonard Kirby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
