Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 1,190,718
Rease v. Mayo Correctional Staff et al
as 1:2024cv22394
Plaintiff: Stefan Dawyne Rease
Defendant: Mayo Correctional Staff, B. Hamlin, Willdle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Travis v. Hamm
as 1:2024cv00206
Petitioner: Wayne Holleman Travis
Respondent: John Q. Hamm
(HC) Lane v. Cates et al
as 2:2024at00787
Petitioner: Jeremy Lane
Respondent: Brian Cates and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Clark v. California Department of Corrections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv01748
Plaintiff: Andre James Clark, Sr
Defendant: California Department of Corrections, Sacramento Parole Department, Sacramento Probation Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randle v. Collier
as 1:2024cv00693
Plaintiff: Jerry Randle
Defendant: Bryan Collier and Patrick L. O'Daniel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
(PC) Marroquin v. Lopez
as 1:2024cv00722
Plaintiff: Thomas Walter Marroquin
Defendant: Elias Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Gaither v. Williams. et al.
as 1:2024cv00728
Plaintiff: Burrell A Gaither
Defendant: Williams, A. George, Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alfred v. Bernstein et al
as 1:2024cv22395
Plaintiff: Jerry Neil Alfred
Defendant: Daniel J. Bernstein, Scott D. Egleston and Brian J. McCormack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Becton
as 3:2024cv03725
Petitioner: Marvin Harris
Respondent: Diana Becton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Urquhart et al
as 3:2024cv00755
Plaintiff: Thomas Smith
Defendant: Mike Urquhart, Doug Thurman and Judge Jennifer Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?