Cases 51 - 60 of 547,959
Brush v. Grosse Pointe Public School System et al
as 2:2024cv11495
Plaintiff:
Mary Anne Brush
Defendant:
Grosse Pointe Public School System, Ahmed Ismail, Lisa Papas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11494
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11491
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
People of the State of Michigan v. Black
as 2:2024cv11498
Plaintiff:
People of the State of Michigan
Defendant:
Yvonne Louise Black
CPM Acquisition Corp. v. Easterday et al
as 1:2024cv00605
Plaintiff:
CPM Aquisition Corp. doing business as CPM Century Extrusion
Defendant:
Brandon Easterday, James Drummond and C.A.Picard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Burton #369585 v. Nurkala et al
as 2:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Ujuan Kirdell Burton #369585
Defendant:
Marsha Nurkala, Unknown Beasley, Unknown Holley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dri-Design, Inc. v. Zeeff Panel Systems, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00602
Plaintiff:
Dri-Design, Inc.
Defendant:
Zeeff Panel Systems, LLC, Leif Haugen, Derek Ledy and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
In re: Passenger Vehicle Replacement Tires Antitrust Litigation
as 5:2024md03107
Defendant:
Continental Aktiengesellschaft, Continental Tire The Americas, LLC, Compagnie Generale Des Etablissements Michelin and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Deal v. Jackson et al.
as 1:2024cv00976
Plaintiff:
Renee Deal
Defendant:
Frank G. Jackson, Richard White and U.S. Surveillance Program
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
