Cases 81 - 90 of 384,898
Josey v. Bell
as 24-1747
Plaintiff:
DEREK JOSEY
Defendant:
Correctional Officer DUSTIN BELL, Clinton Correctional Facility, Correctional Officer JEREMY TUCKER, Clinton Correctional Facility, Sgt. JOHN DOE, Clinton Correctional Facility and others
Hubbard v. County of Los Angeles, et al.
as 24-4038
Plaintiff:
BRYAN HUBBARD
Defendant:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a public entity, ANTHONY C. MARRONE, Chief of Los Angeles County Fire Department and DOES, 1 through 100, inclusive
Nash v. Pacheco, et al.
as 24-4020
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP NASH
Defendant:
LAUREN PACHECO, sued in their individual and official capacities, DEBNEY JARAMILLO, sued in their individual and official capacities, GABRIEL WILSON, sued in their individual and official capacities and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00946
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv03941
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05547
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Jiron v. Tikhonov Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00309
Plaintiff:
Tonya M. Jiron
Defendant:
Tikhonov Enterprises, Inc., Jamaal A. Patterson and Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. DOE
as 9:2024cv80793
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00606
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00608
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
