Cases 51 - 60 of 384,856
Chiasson v. Webre et al
as 2:2024cv01666
Plaintiff:
Mr. Kobi Chiasson
Defendant:
Craig Webre and John Doe(s)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 7:2024cv00544
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 4:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Central Diagnostic Imaging Network, LLC v. Citibank, N.A. et al
as 2:2024cv05521
Plaintiff:
Central Diagnostic Imaging Network, LLC
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fraud
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 5:2024cv00370
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 5:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. DOE
as 9:2024cv80794
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC v. DOE
as 1:2024cv00545
Plaintiff:
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Ciccel v. New York Life Insurance and Annuity Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv05524
Plaintiff:
Earl Ciccel
Defendant:
New York Life Insurance and Annuity Corporation and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. IP address 104.6.246.57, JOHN DOE subscriber assigned
as 9:2024cv80796
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
IP address 104.6.246.57, JOHN DOE subscriber assigned
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
