Cases 41 - 50 of 383,580
Kirziejonek v. Elma Transport Inc.
as 8:2024cv01439
Plaintiff:
Richard Kirziejonek
Defendant:
Elma Transport Inc. and John Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Bank of Hope v. Expedited Travel, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv05019
Plaintiff:
Bank of Hope
Defendant:
Expedited Travel, LLC, Matthew Allen Borisch, Tommys Holding, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
I.K. v. Santa Ana Police Department et al
as 8:2024cv01287
Plaintiff:
I. K.
Defendant:
Santa Ana Police Department, City of Santa Ana, Jimmy Correal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Lee et al v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02590
Plaintiff:
Devonn Arias Lee
Defendant:
FedEx Corporation, FedEx Freight, Inc., ABC Trucking Contractor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle
Holmes v. State of New York DOC and Comm Supervision
as 24-1584
Plaintiff:
CASANOVA HOLMES
Defendant:
NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, JOHN DOE, Healthcare Official and ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-50480
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Shawn Porter v. Jackson Township Highway Department, et al
as 24-3524
Plaintiff:
SHAWN PORTER
Defendant:
JACKSON TOWNSHIP HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT, JACKSON TOWNSHIP TRUSTEES and JOHN DOE
Doe, et al. v. Bonta, et al.
as 24-3700
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE, FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE ORANGE COUNTY, LLC, DA VITA, INC. and others
Defendant:
ROB BONTA, RICARDO LARA, MARY WATANABE and others
Clinton v. Pollard, et al.
as 24-3706
Plaintiff:
MARKEITH CLINTON
Defendant:
M. POLLARD, Warden, R. BUCKEL, Chief Deputy Warden, S. STEADMAN, Associate Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
