Cases 81 - 90 of 21,263
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00310
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Mlynick v. Town of Erving et al
as 3:2024cv30108
Plaintiff:
John Mlynick
Defendant:
Town of Erving, Tucker Jenkins, Adam Paicos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv12265
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Roberts v. DCHD
as 1:2024cv12266
Defendant:
DCHD
Plaintiff:
Cherrelle Roberts
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Ware et al v. Cranston Public Schools et al
as 1:2024cv00348
Defendant:
Michael Traficante, Sara Tindall-Woodman, Superintendent Jeannine Nota-Masse and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Mello and Rachel Ware
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mello v. WPRI Media Inc et al
as 1:2024cv00349
Defendant:
WPRI Media Inc, Shannon Hegy, Mike Montecalvo and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Mello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mello v. Cranston School District et al
as 1:2024cv00350
Defendant:
Major Todd Patalano, Cranston School District, Paul Olszewski and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Mello
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mello v. The Providence Journal et al
as 1:2024cv00351
Plaintiff:
Joshua Mello
Defendant:
The Providence Journal, Jack Perry and Amy Russo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bishay v. Gelpi et al
as 1:2024cv12331
Plaintiff:
Pro Se Party Bahig F. Bishay
Defendant:
Circuit Judge Gustavo A. Gelpi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hernandez-Hernandez v. SPS Specialty Pharmacy Services, Inc.
as 3:2024cv01395
Plaintiff:
Pedro G Hernandez Hernandez
Defendant:
SPS SPECIALTY PHARMACY SERVICES INC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
