Cases 51 - 60 of 3,085
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v. Lenovo (United States), Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv00714
Plaintiff:
TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON
Defendant:
Lenovo (United States), Inc., Lenovo (Shanghai) Electronics Technology Co. Ltd., LENOVO BEIJING CO., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Secure NFC PTY. LTD. v. Mastercard Incorporated
as 3:2023cv00853
Plaintiff:
Secure NFC PTY. LTD.
Defendant:
Mastercard Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Massoud Heidary v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 24-1012
Plaintiff:
MASSOUD HEIDARY
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM, INC. and RING LLC
INCUBATE PRODUCTS, LLC et al v. SHIRLEN
as 1:2023cv01100
Plaintiff:
Incubate Products, LLC, Robert Hefter, Salvadore Castro and others
Defendant:
Andrew M. Shirlen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Formycon AG
as 1:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Defendant:
Formycon AG
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Iron Horse Transport, LLC v. Det Diesel Emission Technologies, LLC et al
as 7:2023cv00791
Plaintiff:
Iron Horse Transport, LLC doing business as DPF Alternatives of Roanoke
Defendant:
Det Diesel Emission Technologies, LLC and Synergy Catalyst, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
TEDESCO et al v. SPOONFLOWER, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv01030
Plaintiff:
SHARON TEDESCO and MARC TEDESCO
Defendant:
SPOONFLOWER, INC. and SHUTTERFLY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Samsung Bioepis, CO., LTD.,
as 1:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Defendant:
Samsung Bioepis, CO., LTD.,
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
