Cases 41 - 50 of 32,029
Brimley et al v. Patterson Warehouses, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02307
Plaintiff:
Brittany Brimley and Travis Faison
Defendant:
Patterson Warehouses, Inc.
Hoek v. Bissell Homecare, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Stacy Hoek
Defendant:
Bissell Homecare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Smith v. University Hospitals Health System, Inc. et al.
as 1:2024cv00516
Plaintiff:
Marchelle Smith
Defendant:
University Hospitals Health System, Inc. and Diane Tub
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
McCain et al v. Phelps et al
as 3:2024cv00325
Plaintiff:
Michael McCain and Southern Electrical Retirement Fund
Defendant:
Bonnie Lee Phelps and Ashley Renee Steedly
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Parsons v. Graham Lumber Company, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01059
Plaintiff:
Chris Parsons
Defendant:
Graham Lumber Company, LLC and American Hardwood Industries, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615 a Family Medical Leave Act
Lynwood Pickens v. Hamilton-Ryker IT Solutions, LLC
as 24-5459
Plaintiff:
LYNWOOD PICKENS, Individually and For Others Similarly Situated
Defendant:
HAMILTON-RYKER IT SOLUTIONS, LLC
Peterson v. Workhorse Technologies, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
Helen Peterson
Defendant:
Workhorse Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act
Luttrell et al v. Hardeman County
as 1:2024cv01105
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Luttrell, Jason McCord and Chadriques Wooden
Defendant:
Tennessee Hardeman County
Aubrey v. Radial, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00287
Plaintiff:
Jerad Aubrey
Defendant:
Radial, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Stinson v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
as 3:2024cv00286
Plaintiff:
Deanna Kay Stinson
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 eb Removal - E.R.I.S.A. Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
