Cases 31 - 40 of 70,385
Lee v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv02412
Plaintiff:
Ronnie T. Lee, Sr.
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Green v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv02413
Plaintiff:
Chester Green, Jr.
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Parr v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv02414
Plaintiff:
Michael Parr
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Strait v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv02416
Plaintiff:
Daniel Strait
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Uncel, Jr. v. Ponomarev et al
as 4:2024cv04065
Plaintiff:
Bobby Uncel, Jr.
Defendant:
Eduard Ponomarev and John Does I-V
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Bird v. Swonger, M.D. et al
as 2:2024cv02080
Plaintiff:
Sabrina Bird
Defendant:
Darin L. Swonger, M.D., Eric Webb, P.A., Mena Regional Health System doing business as Mena Hospital Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Wrongful Death
Tombari v. NOV Process & Flow Technologies US, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00123
Defendant:
National Oilwell Varco, L.P. also known as NOV Wellbore Technologies doing business as Tuboscope, NOV Process & Flow Technologies US, Inc. doing business as NOV Tuboscope, NOV Wellbore Technologies and others
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Tombari
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jones v. US Department of Veterans Affairs
as 4:2024cv04115
Plaintiff:
Brad Lee Jones
Defendant:
US Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Heard et al v. Carrier Logistics of Olathe, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00421
Plaintiff:
Otis Heard and Tisa Heard
Defendant:
Carrier Logistics of Olathe, LLC and Alverso Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Pearcy v. Linde Gas & Equipment Inc.
as 4:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
Jacob Pearcy
Defendant:
Linde Gas & Equipment Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
