Cases 81 - 90 of 74,124
Morris v. Coleman
as 2:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Monica Morris
Defendant:
Does and Tameka Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Murphy v. State of Iowa
as 4:2024cv00140
Petitioner:
Larry Darnell Murphy
Respondent:
State of Iowa
Interested Party:
Aaron Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dansby v. State of Arkansas
as 4:2024cv04032
Petitioner:
Joseph Alexander Dansby, Sr
Respondent:
State of Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Sejnoha v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv04107
Plaintiff:
Jason Sejnoha
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Murphy v. Lewandowski et al
as 4:2024cv04108
Plaintiff:
James B. Murphy
Defendant:
Brad Lewandowski, Myron Rau, Gordon Swanson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Miles v. USA
as 4:2024cv00499
Petitioner:
Anthony Miles
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Robinson v. Dauck et al
as 3:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Waltilia Shre Robinson
Defendant:
Dauck and Stout
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Estes v. Tabor
as 2:2024cv02073
Petitioner:
Shaun Jermaine Estes
Respondent:
Judge Stephen Tabor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Layne v. Wellpath Medical et al
as 6:2024cv06082
Plaintiff:
Robert Matthew Layne
Defendant:
Wellpath Medical and RN Kelly Aunspaugh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watkins v. USA DO NOT DOCKET. ALL DOCKETING OCCURS IN THE CRIMINAL CASE.
as 0:2024cv02218
Petitioner:
Deon Cameron Watkins
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
