Cases 91 - 100 of 351,013
Ephrain Marchan, Jr. v. The Rep. of Trinidad & Tobago, et al
as 24-2228
Petitioner:
Ephrain Mark Marchan, Jr.
Respondent:
The Republic of Trinidad and Tobago, Northern Ireland and United Kingdom of Great Britain
Accent Media, Inc. v. Kershaw, Cutter & Ratinoff, et al
as 24-2223
Plaintiff:
Accent Media, Inc.
Defendant:
Kershaw, Cutter & Ratinoff, LLP, Eric Ratinoff Law Corp., Cutter Law, PC and others
United Financial Casualty Company v. Kansas E3, LLC et al
as 5:2024cv05094
Plaintiff:
United Financial Casualty Company
Defendant:
Kansas E3, LLC, Red Line Contractors, LLC, Fidel Rua and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Rooks v. McCool et al
as 4:2024cv00520
Plaintiff:
Wayne Rooks, Jr
Defendant:
Jackie McCool, Mark Rodenberry, Christopher Waring and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schurman v. Luke et al
as 4:2024cv04113
Petitioner:
Stephanie Amanda Schurman
Respondent:
Steven Luke and Marty Jackley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Schurman v Luke et al
as 4:2024cv04114
Petitioner:
Stephanie Amanda Schurman
Defendant:
Steven Luke and Marty Jackley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dorsey v. USA
as 1:2024cv00080
Petitioner:
Eric B. Dorsey
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01452
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Assertive Aspirational Behavioral Health Care Services, LLC v. UnitedHealth Group Incorporated et al
as 0:2024cv02294
Plaintiff:
Assertive Aspirational Behavioral Health Care Services, LLC
Defendant:
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated, Optum, Inc. and Change Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
