Cases 41 - 50 of 8,843
DUBOSE v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 2:2024cv01644
Plaintiff:
ZUMAR DUBOSE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation v. Fitch
as 1:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Defendant:
Lynn Fitch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Hidalgo v. State of Texas
as 4:2024cv02098
Appellant:
Michael Hidalgo
Defendant:
STATE OF TEXAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
COLLIER v. COLLIER
as 1:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
IRINA COLLIER
Defendant:
CHARLES WADE COLLIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Walton v. Smith
as 1:2024cv03237
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Walton
Defendant:
Dianna Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Clark v. City Impound Lot et al
as 4:2024cv03104
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W. Clark
Defendant:
City Impound Lot, Mr. Jim Schwartztrauber, Ms. Sara Schwartztrauber and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Watson v. Texas Municipal League Intergovernmental Risk Pool
as 7:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Mark Joseph Watson
Defendant:
Texas Municipal League Intergovernmental Risk Pool
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
THE GEO GROUP, INC. v. MURPHY et al
as 3:2024cv04990
Plaintiff:
THE GEO GROUP, INC.
Defendant:
PHILIP D. MURPHY and MATTHEW J. PLATKIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Team Kennedy vs Francisco V. Aguilar
as 2:2024cv01027
Plaintiff:
Team Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Zamperini Airfield Preservation Society V. City of Torrance et al
as 2:2024cv04538
Petitioner:
Zamperini Airfield Preservation Society and CITY OF TORRANCE, a California Municipal Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
