Cases 51 - 60 of 1,203,263
Hinkle v. OSU Hospital
as 1:2024cv01649
Plaintiff:
Bryan E. Hinkle
Defendant:
OSU Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chandler v. State of Ohio
as 2:2024cv03982
Petitioner:
Kymm V. Chandler
Respondent:
State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jacobs v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority et al
as 2:2024cv03983
Petitioner:
Phillip D. Jacobs
Respondent:
Ohio Adult Parole Authority and Warden, Marion Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03980
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Russell v. Craig County
as 4:2024cv00455
Plaintiff:
Jason Russell
Defendant:
Craig County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. Quick et al
as 6:2024cv00349
Defendant:
Sgt. Ross, Sherry Day Moony, Christie Quick and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmie McCoy, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Grady County Law Enforcement Center
as 5:2024cv00999
Respondent:
Grady County Law Enforcement Center
Petitioner:
Kalo Rawn Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Barnett v. Bridges et al
as 5:2024cv01001
Respondent:
Mark Knutson and Carrie Bridges
Petitioner:
Christopher J Barnett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hill v. Grady County Law Enforcement Center et al
as 5:2024cv00998
Defendant:
Megan LNU, Northern Cheyenne Tribal Courts, Bureau of Indian Affairs and others
Plaintiff:
Kalo Rawn Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons v. Miller et al
as 1:2024cv01632
Defendant:
Jamie Miller and Ellen F. Rosenblum
Petitioner:
Levi Dane Simmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
