Cases 51 - 60 of 2,915
Baron-St. Laurent v. Lister et al
as 2:2024cv00825
Petitioner:
Ronald Rene Baron-St. Laurent, Sr.
Respondent:
Joseph Lister, Spurgeon A Moore, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Sims v. Coalinga State Hospital et al
as 1:2024cv00433
Plaintiff:
Robert Sims
Defendant:
Coalinga State Hospital and Sara V. Centeno
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stanbridge v. Batterton et al
as 4:2024cv04061
Plaintiff:
Kevin W Stanbridge
Defendant:
T Battington, Wexford Health Sources Inc, Illinois Department of Human Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zumar DuBose, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1615
Plaintiff:
ZUMAR DUBOSE and ABDUSH DUBOSE
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Hill v. Recca et al
as 4:2024cv02134
Plaintiff:
Cymeyon V. Hill
Defendant:
PT Recca, PT Sean, PT Emma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blakney v. United States of America
as 5:2024ct03082
Plaintiff:
Larry Blakney
Defendant:
United States of America, Warden Scarantino, Logan Grady and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Powers v. Lodge et al
as 4:2024cv04058
Plaintiff:
Thomas Powers
Defendant:
Paula Lodge, Shan Jumper, . Queen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reevis v. No Named Defendant
as 2:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Charles Joseph Reevis
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reevis v. No Named Defendant
as 2:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Charles Joseph Reevis
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reevis v. No Named Defendant
as 2:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Charles Joseph Reevis
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
