Cases 121 - 130 of 4,583
David Matthews
as 23-5471
Petitioner:
In re: DAVID EUGENE MATTHEWS
Respondent:
RANDY L. WHITE and SCOTT JORDAN
Cromwell v. Thornell et al
as 2:2023cv00783
Petitioner:
Robert Louis Cromwell
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Staci Ibarra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Milton Taylor v. Commissioner Delaware Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-1858
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MILTON TAYLOR
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Manuel Sepulveda v. Secretary Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-1813
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MANUEL SEPULVEDA
Defendant / Appellee:
SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI
Robin Row v. Janell Clement, et al
as 23-99004
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBIN LEE ROW
Respondent / Appellee:
JANELL CLEMENT, THOMAS J. BEAUCLAIR and BRIAN UNDERWOOD
Demetrius Howard v. Oak Smith
as 5:2023cv00705
Petitioner:
Demetrius Howard
Respondent:
Oak Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Donald Johnson v. Scott Jordan
as 23-5330
Petitioner / Appellant:
DONALD HERB JOHNSON
Respondent / Appellee:
SCOTT JORDAN, Warden
Paul Speer v. Staci Ibarra, et al
as 23-99003
Petitioner / Appellant:
PAUL BRADLEY SPEER
Respondent / Appellee:
STACI IBARRA, Warden, Arizona State Prison - Eyman Complex and RYAN THORNELL, Director of the Arizona Department of Corrections
BARWICK v. DESANTIS et al
as 4:2023cv00146
Plaintiff:
DARRYL BRYAN BARWICK
Defendant:
RON DESANTIS, ASHLEY MOODY, JIMMY PATRONIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sievers v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Lee County)
as 3:2023cv00373
Petitioner:
Mark D. Sievers
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF FLORIDA and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
