Cases 81 - 90 of 193,381
GADDIS v. DUNLAP et al
as 1:2024cv01026
Plaintiff:
JAMAR GADDIS
Defendant:
DUNLAP, DUSTIN, BAKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. USA et al
as 7:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Sandy Brown
Defendant:
USA and John Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
ALPHONSE v. WHITE et al
as 3:2024cv00278
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP ALPHONSE
Defendant:
J WHITE, MATHEW BURDETT, ALLIGOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORE v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2024cv00248
Petitioner:
JOHN MOORE, III
Respondent:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FRANKLIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen, Gene v. Jackson
as 1:2024cv22346
Plaintiff:
Gene Autree Allen
Defendant:
C. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Sardon v. Dodd et al
as 3:2024cv01523
Defendant:
Dr Chin, Rachel Dodd, Dr Chen and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie Sardon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HENSON v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORR. et al
as 1:2024cv01033
Plaintiff:
JARED MALACHI HENSON
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORR., STEVEN JACKSON, LISA WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCUTERI et al v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANDREW SCUTERI and 500 INMATES OF THE PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, TRICIA PRETORIUS, CHRISTINA REAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HIPPS v. MILLER et al
as 3:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
NATHAN ROBERT HIPPS
Defendant:
LUCAS MILLER, SWAIN and LAFAR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bellamy (ID 53454) v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 5:2024cv03102
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Allen Bellamy, Jr.
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation, (fnu) Zmuda, (fnu) Holthaus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
