Cases 171 - 180 of 65,977
Fairchild v. Arkansas, State of
as 4:2024cv00465
Plaintiff:
Joseph Levell Fairchild
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Porter v. Harmon et al
as 3:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Mark Porter
Defendant:
Zachery S Harmon, Thomas Hurst, Janice Blake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fairchild v. Arkansas Department of Correction
as 4:2024cv00468
Plaintiff:
Joseph Fairchild
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Thompson v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 6:2024cv06076
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Bordelon Thompson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 g Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Peeples v. McCormick et al
as 4:2024cv00464
Plaintiff:
James Peeples
Defendant:
David McCormick and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Dudley v. Arkansas Insurance Department et al
as 4:2024cv04055
Plaintiff:
Karanya-Marquis Dudley
Defendant:
Arkansas Insurance Department and State of Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv05118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv06075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Owens v. Waller et al
as 4:2024cv04057
Plaintiff:
Marcus Oneil Laquient Owens and Mark
Defendant:
Ms. Waller, Ms. Arnold and Sheriff Wayne Easley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
