Cases 81 - 90 of 111,999
MAYBERRY v. EMMERSON et al
as 1:2024cv00768
Plaintiff:
JOSH MAYBERRY
Defendant:
DONALD EMMERSON, LPN, NP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GABALDON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00767
Plaintiff:
FRANK GABALDON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $106,503.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY
as 1:2024cv00752
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
$106,503.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Lopez et al v. Dakich et al
as 2:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Ph.D. Dr. Linda Lopez and Impact Strategies, Inc.
Defendant:
Thomas P. Dakich, Ryan D. Lafler, Greater South Shore Technology Initiative, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Campos v. Walmart Inc
as 1:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
Maria Campos
Defendant:
Walmart Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Armour v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00356
Petitioner:
Rickey R Armour
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Morales
as 3:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
Billy Williams
Defendant:
Morales
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DEVINE v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00751
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY L. DEVINE
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
YOUNG v. ACLU et al
as 2:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
MARION L. YOUNG, I
Defendant:
ACLU, KENNETH FAK and GAVIN M. ROSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
