Cases 1 - 10 of 157
Howard v. Bisenius, et al
as 24-1502
Plaintiff:
DAVID W. HOWARD
Defendant:
THERESA A. BISENIUS, JENNIFER M.R. ULWICK, MARY RUDOLPH BLACK and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1458
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Barth v. Town of Waterboro, et al
as 24-1170
Plaintiff:
JOHN S. BARTH
Defendant:
TOWN OF WATERBORO, GARY LAMB, SAMUEL G. JOHNSON and others
Vose v. Kilmartin, et al
as 24-1066
Plaintiff:
CARLTON VOSE
Defendant:
PETER F. KILMARTIN, GERALD J. COYNE, PATRICIA K. ROCHA and others
Pinney v. City of Cambridge, et al
as 23-2075
Plaintiff:
GITAPUSHY VAL ANGEL and JOHNATHAN PINNEY, a/k/a Gitapushy Val Angel
Defendant:
CAMBRIDGE, MA and HEIDI MAE WEILMUENSTER
Parker v. Hutnak, et al
as 23-2006
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID PARKER
Defendant / Appellee:
KIMBERLY HUTNAK, NOELLE K. CLAPHAM, as a representative of the court, and as an individual, PHYLLIS HUTNAK, as an individual and others
In Re: Parker
as 23-2005
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID PARKER, acting as guardian on behalf of R.P.
Respondent / Appellee:
KIMBERLY HUTNAK, NOELLE K. CLAPHAM, as a representative of the court, and as an individual, PHYLLIS HUTNAK, as an individual and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1934
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Strahan v. McCafferty, et al
as 23-1734
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD MAXIMUS STRAHAN
Defendant / Appellee:
LANDYA B. MCCAFFERTY, ANDREA K. JOHNSTONE and STEVEN J. MCAULIFFE
Isijola v. NH Department of Safety, et al
as 23-1732
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FEMI ISIJOLA
Defendant / Appellee:
NH DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY, AARON R. RICHARDS, individually and in his official capacity, LINDA CAPUCHINO, individually and in her official capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
