Cases 31 - 40 of 93
Winfield, et al v. Keefe, et al
as 19-1304
Defendant:
WENDY ADAMS, DERRECK DERANIAN, Officer, SOBAHN NAMVAR, Officer and others
Defendant / Appellee:
PATRICK KEEFE, CHAD COOPER, PATRICK KEEFE, Police Chief and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARIE Y. WINFIELD and ROBERT WINFIELD
Interested Party:
NIKHIL THAKUR
Widi v. McNeil, et al
as 19-1241
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT KEVIN CADY, ELIOT POLICE DEPARTMENT, SA STEPHEN E. HICKEY, JR. and others
Defendant:
OFFICE OF INFORMATION POLICY, US ATTORNEYS OFFICE, US BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES and others
Interested Party:
TRAVIS WEBBER
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID J. WIDI, JR.
Holloman v. Maine, et al
as 19-1037
Defendant:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Commissioner, Department of Corrections, in his official and individual capacities, BRUCE GELB, Superintendent, Souza Baranowski Correctional Center, in his official and individual capacities, JEFFREY P. DAIGNEAULT, Correctional Officer, Souza Baranowski Correctional Center, in his official and individual capacities and others
Defendant / Appellee:
AARON GILL, Sergeant Corrections Officer, Souza Baranowki Correctional Center, in his official and individual capacities and FRANK MAINE, Correctional Officer, Souza Baranowski Correctional Center, in his official and individual capacities
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TAJUAN HOLLOMAN
Peterson v. Masse, et al
as 17-1559
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WARREN E. PETERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN MASSE, Lieutenant, NH Department of Corrections, in his individual and official capacity, CHARLES BOYIJIAN, RICHARD M. GERRY, NH State Prison, Warden, in both his individual and official capacity and others
Defendant:
FNU HAVLOCK, Lieutenant, in his individual and official capacity and FNU COURCHESNE, Lieutenant, in his individual and official capacity
Swiridowsky v. Kettle, et al
as 17-1409
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER SWIRIDOWSKY
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW KETTLE, BURT, LIEUTENANT VIOLANTE and others
Defendant:
NICHOLS
Widi v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 17-1292
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID J. WIDI, JR.
Defendant:
MICHELLE GONYEA, Case Management Coordinator, FCI Ray Brook, f/k/a FNU Gaunyea, FNU KUZNECOW, (first name unknown) Correctional Officer, FCI Berlin, K. LEWIS, Physician's Assistant, FCI Berlin and others
Defendant - Appellee:
E. L. TATUM, Warden, FCI Berlin, a/k/a Esker Lee Tatum, DAN SULLIVAN, Case Management Coordinator, FCI Berlin, WANDA MULLINS, Unit Manager, FCI Berlin and others
Interested Party:
BRIAN PATTERSON
Stile v. US Marshals Service, et al
as 16-2146
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES STILE
Defendant:
US MARSHALS SERVICE, RAYMOND BOWERS, Administrator, Strafford County House of Corrections, GEORGE MAGLARAS, Commissioner, Strafford County and others
Defendant - Appellee:
STRAFFORD COUNTY HOUSE OF CORRECTIONS, BRUCE PELKIE, Superintendent, Strafford County Department of Corrections, in both his individual and official capacity, STRAFFORD COUNTY and others
Barry v. Joyce, et al
as 16-1902
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL MICHAEL BARRY
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN J. JOYCE, Sheriff, STEVE BUTTS, Captain, LIEUTENANT MOORE and others
Defendant:
CUMBERLAND COUNTY JAIL
March v. Mill
as 16-1771
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ANDREW MARCH
Defendant - Appellant:
JANET T. MILLS, individually and in her official capacity as Attorney General for the State of Maine
Defendant:
WILLIAM PREIS, individually and in his official capacity as a Police Lieutenant of the City of Portland, PORTLAND, ME, JASON NADEAU, individually and in his official capacity as a Police Officer of the City of Portland and others
Perry v. Roy, et al
as 16-1704
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RICO PERRY
Defendant - Appellant:
SUSIE ROY and CLAIRE ROCHA
Defendant:
SHERIFF THOMAS M. HODGSON, Bristol County Sheriff, GEORGE A. VOSE, JR., Superintendent of Bristol County Jail, MAJOR JAMES LANCASTER, Assistant Deputy Superintendent of Security at Bristol County Jail and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
