Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Cases 71 - 80 of 23,152
US v. Rivera-Lopez
as 24-1400
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant: JUAN GABRIEL RIVERA-LOPEZ
US v. Taborda-Bolivar
as 24-1406
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant: JHON TABORDA-BOLIVAR
US v. Joseph-Deceus
as 24-1402
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant: HANS MARIO JOSEPH-DECEUS, a/k/a Negro
US v. Trinidad-Jorge
as 24-1408
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant: JOSE RAUL TRINIDAD-JORGE, a/k/a Trini
Owl Feather-Gorbey v. District of Columbia, et al
as 24-1401
Plaintiff: MICHAEL S. OWL FEATHER-GORBEY, a/k/a Michael S. Gorbey, a/k/a Tsunami Khan
Defendant: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, D.C. CIRCUIT FEDERAL COURTS, 2ND CIRCUIT FEDERAL COURTS and others
Soscia Holdings, LLC v. State of Rhode Island, et al
as 24-1397
Plaintiff: SOSCIA HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant: STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, STATE OF RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, TERENCE GRAY, individually and in his capacity as the Director of the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management and others
Interested Party: STEVEN J. RILEY
Johnson v. Ocasio-Montanez, et al
as 24-1423
Petitioner: OBE E. JOHNSON
Respondent: LUIS OCASIO-MONTANEZ and DOMINGO EMANUELLI HERNANDEZ
Rotondo v. Salisbury, et al
as 24-1410
Plaintiff: GINO ROTONDO, SR.
Defendant: WAYNE T. SALISBURY, JR., individial capacity, KIMBERLY KANE, MD, individual capacity, LORI VENTITUOLO, individual capacity and others
US v. Morales-Hernandez
as 24-1398
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant: ANGEL L. MORALES-HERNANDEZ, a/k/a Angel, a/k/a Chinese Checker
Naicom Corporation, et al v. Dish Network Corporation, et al
as 24-1416
Plaintiff: NAICOM CORPORATION, D&V IP HOLDINGS, LLC, PAYLINK, LLC and others
Defendant: DISH NETWORK CORPORATION, DISH NETWORK L.L.C., NAGRASTAR L.L.C. and others
Type: Other Statutes RICO

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?