Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 21-1332
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Washington-Del Valle, et al v. Rivera-Schatz, et al
as 21-1231
Defendant:
JOSE LUIS DALMAU-SANTIAGO, in his official capacity as President of the Senate of Puerto Rico, RAFAEL HERNANDEZ-MONTANEZ, CARLOS JOHNNY MENDEZ, in his personal capacity and in his official capacity as Speaker of the House of Representatives and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LUIS A. RIVERA-GONZALEZ, ARIADNA LOPEZ, IVONNE BORRERO-CASADO and others
Defendant / Appellant:
THOMAS RIVERA-SCHATZ, in his personal capacity and in his official capacity as President of the Senate of Puerto Rico, LISANDRA MALDONADO-ALVARADO, WILFREDO RAMOS-GARCIA and others
Interested Party:
PR DEPT OF JUSTICE
Montilla, et al v. Federal Nat'l Mortgage Ass'n, et al
as 20-1673
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NERIS MONTILLA, On behalf of themselves and all others so similarly situated, ROSELIA MONTUFAR, On behalf of themselves and all others so similarly situated, MICHAEL KYRIAKAKIS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, COOPER, FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY and others
Defendant:
SETERUS, INC. and COOPER, f/k/a Nationstar Mortgage, LLC
Plaintiff:
ROSELIA MONTUFAR, on behalf of herself and all others so similarly situated and RUBEN VELASQUEZ, on behalf of themhimself and all others so similarly situated
Neris-Ruiz v. US
as 14-2009
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANGEL LUIS NERIS-RUIZ
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Orozco v. Holder
as 12-1455
Petitioner:
NERY OROZCO
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
US v. Neris-Ruiz
as 12-1380
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
ANGEL LUIS NERIS-RUIZ, a/k/a Bam Bam, a/k/a Angel Luis Neris-Ortiz
Nerys v. Holder, Jr.
as 12-1058
Petitioner:
LEANDRO DA SILVA NERYS, a/k/a Leandro Nerys, a/k/a Leandro Neriys
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
US v. Neris-Ruiz
as 11-1263
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
ANGEL LUIS NERIS-RUIZ, a/k/a Bam Bam, a/k/a Angel Luis Neris-Ortiz
Araujo, et al v. Providence, RI, et al
as 08-2417
Plaintiff:
SONDRA BUOTE, EILEEN CALCAGNI, MADELAINE DEROBBIO and others
Plaintiff - Appellee/Cross-Appellant:
JAMIE ARAUJO, ANDREA BAKER, MICHELLE A. BARRETT and others
Defendant:
JOSEPH RICHARDSON, individually and in his official capacity as the former Deputy Director of the Communications Department, VINCENT A. CIANCI, JR., individually and in his official capacity as the former Mayor for the City of Providence and URBANO PRIGNANO, JR., individually and in his official capacity as the former Chief of Police for the City of Providence
Defendant - Appellant/Cross-Appellee:
PROVDIDENCE, RI, by and through its treasurer, Steven T. Napolitano, DAVID N. CICILLINE, in his official capacity as Mayor and Acting Public Safety Commissioner for the City of Providence, COLONEL DEAN ESSERMAN, in his official capacity as the Chief of Police for the City of Providence and others
:
and
Walden, et al v. Lennon, et al
as 08-1536
Plaintiff:
SONDRA BUOTE, EILEEN CALCAGNI, MADELAINE DEROBBIO and others
Plaintiff - Appellee/Cross-Appellant:
JAMIE ARAUJO, ANDREA BAKER, MICHELLE A. BARRETT and others
Defendant:
VINCENT A. CIANCI, JR., individually and in his former official capacity as the former Mayor for the City of Providence, JOSEPH RICHARDSON, individually and in his former official capacity as the former Deputy Director of the Communications Department, JOHN C. CHMURA and others
Defendant - Appellant/Cross-Appellee:
PROVDIDENCE, RI, by and through its Treasurer, Steven T. Naplitano, DAVID N. CICILLINE, in his official capacity as Mayor and Acting Public Safety Commissioner for the City of Providence, COLONEL DEAN ESSERMAN, in his official capacity as the Chief of Police for the City of Providence and others
:
and
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
