Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Mello v. Warren Housing Authority
as 1:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Schantelle Mello
Defendant:
Warren Housing Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Karten et al v. Town of Warren Zoning Board of Review et al
as 1:2022cv00193
Plaintiff:
Daniel Karten, Marissa Joinson and Tracy Joinson
Defendant:
Town of Warren Zoning Board of Review, Andrew G. Ellis, W. Barrett Holby, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00404
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
Lemire v. State of Rhode Island et al
as 1:2020cv00408
Defendant:
Barrington Town Hall, Jamestown, City of Newport and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey E. Lemire
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00248
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Clements v. Martinez et al
as 1:2020cv00071
Plaintiff:
Rick Clements
Defendant:
Criss Martinez, Jim Pulice, Admiralty Newport Associates, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Camelo et al v. Bristol-Warren Regional School District et al
as 1:2019cv00660
Defendant:
Bristol-Warren Regional School Committee, Bristol-Warren Regional School District, Mario Andrade and others
Plaintiff:
Jodi Camelo and Michael Camelo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00351
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
NEIMPAUG v. STATE OF RHODE ISLAND et al
as 1:2017cv00565
Plaintiff:
SAGAMORE PO WAUIPI NEIMPAUG
Defendant:
State of Rhode Island, Town of Bristol, Town of Barrington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
