Cases 1 - 10 of 25
ACLU of NH v. US Customs and Border Protection
as 1:2023cv00282
Plaintiff:
ACLU of NH
Defendant:
US Customs and Border Protection
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Florence Immigrant & Refugee Rights Project et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2023cv10479
Plaintiff:
Florence Immigrant & Refugee Rights Project and Lawyers for Civil Rights
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security and United States Customs and Border Protection
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
City of Quincy, MA, et al v. FERC
as 22-1201
Petitioner:
QUINCY, MA, BRAINTREE, MA and FORE RIVER RESIDENTS AGAINST THE COMPRESSOR STATION (FRRACS)
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Interested Party:
SANDRA PETERS, REBECCA HAUGH, GARY PETERS and others
Harvard Immigration and Refugee Clinical Program v. United States Customs and Border Protection
as 1:2022cv10301
Plaintiff:
Harvard Immigration and Refugee Clinical Program
Defendant:
United States Customs and Border Protection
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
National Immigration Litigation Alliance et al v. U.S. Customs and Border Protection
as 1:2021cv11094
Plaintiff:
Haitian Bridge Alliance, National Immigration Alliance, Al Otro Lado and others
Defendant:
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Harvard Immigration and Refugee Clinical Program v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2021cv10486
Defendant:
Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Executive Office for Immigration Review, Department of Justice and others
Plaintiff:
Harvard Immigration and Refugee Clinical Program
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Bollat Vasquez, et al v. Wolf, et al
as 20-1554
Plaintiff / Appellee:
J.C., LUISA M. VASQUEZ PEREZ DE BOLLAT, ANDRES OSWALDO BOLLAT VASQUEZ, individually and as next friend to Luisa Marisol Vasquez Perez de Bollat, and as father and next friend to A.B. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, CHAD F. WOLF, Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP and others
Amicus Curiae:
DAVID ROBINSON, JUSTICE CENTER OF SOUTHEAST MASSACHUSETTS, KIDS IN NEED OF DEFENSE and others
Alasaad, et al v. Wolf, et al
as 20-1081
Interested Party:
REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS, CONSTITUTIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY CENTER, R STREET INSTITUTE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEREMIE DUPIN, AARON GACH, NADIA ALASAAD and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, Acting Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, in his official capacity, CHAD WOLF, Acting Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, in his official capacity and MARK A. MORGAN, Acting Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, in his official capacity
Plaintiff:
TECHFREEDOM
Defendant / Appellant:
MARK A. MORGAN, Acting Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, in his official capacity and CHAD WOLF, Acting Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, in his official capacity
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SUHAIB ALLABABIDI
Alasaad, et al v. Wolf, et al
as 20-1077
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MATTHEW WRIGHT, NADIA ALASAAD, MOHAMMED AKRAM SHIBLY and others
Interested Party:
REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS, R STREET INSTITUTE, CENTER FOR DEMOCRACY & TECHNOLOGY and others
Defendant / Appellant:
THOMAS D. HOMAN, Acting Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, in his official capacity, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, Acting Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, in his official capacity, ELAINE DUKE, Acting Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, in her official capacity and others
American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of New Hampshire v. US Customs and Border Protection
as 1:2019cv00977
Plaintiff:
American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of New Hampshire
Defendant:
US Customs and Border Protection
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
