Cases 11 - 20 of 517
El Khoury v. Goulding, et al
as 23-1282
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IMAD G. EL KHOURY
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL GOULDING, Police Chief, EFTHIMIOS BOUSIOS, Sergeant, WILLIAM CARLO, Detective and others
Interested Party:
MA TRIAL COURT
Rodriguez-Orellanes, et al v. Executive Airlines, et al
as 23-1270
Plaintiff:
ELAINE RODRIGUEZ-LOPEZ, PEDRO CAMACHO, LUIS MANUEL MACIAS MONTALVO and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JESUS PIMENTEL, ENIEDA ORTIZ, OLGA RAMOS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
EXECUTIVE AIRLINES, d/b/a American Eagle, AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., ENVOY AIR, INC. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv10609
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Sauri Santiago v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01624
Plaintiff:
Gloria Sauri Santiago
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc., Jose F Oramas, Nancy Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00418
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Smith v. ADS Carlos et al
as 1:2022cv11626
Plaintiff:
Steven L Smith
Defendant:
ADS Carlos, Supervisor of the Suffolk County Jail's Legal Department and Lina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1607
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1584
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1556
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1549
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
