Cases 21 - 30 of 1,042
Williams v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2024cv10080
Plaintiff:
Sabrina M Williams and Pro se litigant Sabrina M Williams
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Judge Theresa Bisenius, Judge Jennifer Ulwick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Clayton v. Roy et al
as 4:2024cv40020
Plaintiff:
John B. Clayton, IV
Defendant:
Derek Roy, William Hughes, Joseph Earley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hakim Douglas v. Suffolk County District Attorney's Office et al
as 4:2024cv40002
Plaintiff:
Tyron Jarome Hakim Douglas
Defendant:
Suffolk County District Attorney's Office and William A. Hinton Laboratory
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Williams v. Commonwealth
as 1:2023cv12999
Plaintiff:
Sabrina M Williams and Pro se litigant Sabrina M Williams
Defendant:
Commonwealth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Howell v. Leahy, et al
as 23-1995
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CURTIS L. HOWELL
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN LEAHY, Mayor of Lowell, SOKHARY CHAU, Mayor of Lowell, RICHARD CESARZ, Lowell Police Officer and others
Defendant:
WILLIAM SAMARAS, City of Council, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, LOWELL, MA and others
Williams v. Williams
as 1:2023cv13180
Plaintiff:
Rayon Williams
Defendant:
Sabrina M Williams and Pro se litigant Sabrina M Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Duran v. Williams
as 1:2023cv13182
Defendant:
Sabrina M Williams and Dilcia Duran
Plaintiff:
Pro se litigant Sabrina M Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Williams et al
as 1:2024cv10110
Plaintiff:
Sabrina M Williams and Pro se litigant Sabrina M Williams
Defendant:
Rayon Williams and Denise J. Casper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
