Civil Rights Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 247
Saya v. Donchess, et al
as 22-1545
Plaintiff / Appellant: WAYNE P. SAYA, SR.
Defendant / Appellee: JAMES W. DONCHESS, in his official capacity as Mayor of the City of Nashua, NH, LORI WILSHIRE, in her official capacity as President of the Nashua, NH Board of Alderman and ANGELA CONSENTINO, individually and as third-party contractor Epidemiologist for the City of Nashua, NH, Divsion of Public Health and Community Services
Defendant: CHRISTOPHER T. SUNUNU, in his official capacity as Honorable Governor of the State of NH, LORI SHIBINETTE, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the NH Department of Health and Human Services and BENJAMIN P. CHAN, MD, MPH, individually and in his official capacity as State Epidemiologist and Medical Doctor for the State of NH
Tyler, et al v. Long, et al
as 22-1514
Plaintiff / Appellant: ERROLL TYLER, in his individual capacity and in his capacity as President and CEO of NAUTICAL TOURS, INC., ALLENA TABB-HARPER and NAUTICAL TOURS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee: THOMAS LEMA, individually and in his official capacity as Inspector of Carriages, Hackney Carriage Unit and GREGORY LONG, in his official capacity as Acting Commissioner of Boston Police
Arrington v. The City of Boston, et al
as 22-1589
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL DEWAYNE ARRINGTON
Defendant / Appellee: BOSTON, MA, HORACE COLEMAN, GREGORY LONG, in his official capacity as Acting Commissioner of the Boston Police Department and others
Strege v. Vos, et al
as 22-1527
Plaintiff / Appellant: ADAM PAUL STREGE
Defendant / Appellee: ERIC A. VOS, Chief Public Defender in his official and individual capacity, SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC, LTD, MARTI LICON-VITALE, Warden of MDC Guaynabo, in his official and individual capacity and others
Howell v. Lowell Police Department, et al
as 22-1469
Plaintiff / Appellant: CURTIS HOWELL
Defendant / Appellee: LOWELL REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, THOMAS PETER SIOPES, LOWELL POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Defendant: DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Howard v. Social Security Commissioner We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00250
Petitioner: Roderick Howard
Respondent: Social Security Commissioner
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Canales-Cancel v. Government of the US, et al
as 22-1459
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOSE L. CANALES-CANCEL and JOSE LUIS CANALES-CANCEL, SR.
Defendant / Appellee: US GOVERNMENT, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, AEELA and others
Does, et al v. Mills, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-1435
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOHN DOES, 1-3, JACK DOES, 1-1000, JANE DOES, 1-6 and others
Defendant / Appellee: JANET T. MILLS, in her official capacity as Governor of the State of Maine, JEANNE LAMBREW, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the Maine Department of Health and Human Services, NIRAV D. SHAH, in his official capacity as Director of the Maine Center for Disease Control and Prevention and others
Interested Party: MTM ACQUISITION, INC. and SJ ACQUISITION, INC.
Intervenor: MTM ACQUISITION, INC., d/b/a Portland Press Herald, /Maine Sunday Telegram, Kennebec Journal, and Morning Sentinel and SJ ACQUISITION, INC., d/b/a Sun Journal
Clapp v. Tobin, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-1350
Plaintiff / Appellant: KEVIN S. CLAPP
Defendant: CHARLES DUANE BAKER, JR., Governor of Massachusetts, MICHAEL W. MORRISSEY, Norfolk County District Attorney, RICHARD D. MCKEON, Massachusetts State Police (Retired) and others
Defendant / Appellee: TROOPER BRUCE TOBIN, Norfolk County District Attorney's Office, TROOPER SCOTT KEARNS, Norfolk County District Attorney's Office, SGT. BRIAN BROOKS, Norfolk County District Attorney's Office and others
Canales-Cancel v. U.S. Government et al
as 3:2022cv01226
Plaintiff: Jose L. Canales-Cancel
Defendant: U.S. Government, U.S. Department of Justice, AEELA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?