Cases 1 - 10 of 74
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv40050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Davis v Joe Miller, Inc., et al
as 4:2023cv40098
Defendant:
Joe Miller, Inc., Miller Fence Company, Inc., Joe Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Gordon Jon Davis
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 548 Unfair and Deceptive Trade Acts
Ritrovato v. Eastern Bank et al
as 1:2023cv10713
Defendant:
John Aloise, Eastern Bank and Gordon DiMarzo
Plaintiff:
Nicholas A Ritrovato, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv10146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv12213
Counter Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Gould v. State of Massachusetts et al
as 3:2022cv30116
Plaintiff:
Rodney Elliot Gould
Defendant:
State of Massachusetts, Land Court Department, Judge Gordon H. Piper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
CROSSON v. OBERT
as 1:2022cv00168
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY D CROSSON
Defendant:
GORDON OBERT, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Eaton v. Town of Townsend, et al
as 22-1334
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT M. EATON
Defendant / Appellee:
TOWNSEND, MA, JAMES M. KREIDLER, JR., GORDON CLARK and others
Interested Party:
DAVID C. JENKINS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
