Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Rodriguez v. City of Worcester et al
as 4:2023cv40010
Plaintiff:
Marilene Rodriguez, Steven M. Sargent, David Doherty and others
Defendant:
City of Worcester, Jason Gaumon, Alex Maracallo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Perry v. Attorney General Maura Heala et al
as 1:2023cv10228
Plaintiff:
Rico Perry
Defendant:
Attorney General Maura Heala, Attorney General Rachel Rollins, Cube Smart Self-Storage and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Clervrain v. Healey et al
as 1:2022cv10545
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Defendant:
Attorney General Maura Healey, Bill Galvin, Ed Markey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Waters v. Facebook Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv30168
Defendant:
William Higgins, Katherine Peter, Google LLC. and others
Plaintiff:
Rian Waters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Higgins v. Lelling et al
as 1:2020cv10893
Plaintiff:
John T. Higgins
Defendant:
City of Melrose, MA, US Attorney Andrew E Lelling and Stephen's Auto Body & Towing Svc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Smith v. Town of Barnstable et al
as 1:2019cv12305
Defendant:
Spencer Jackson, William Jacques, Daniel Bennett and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Higgins v. City of Melrose et al
as 1:2019cv12182
Defendant:
Stephen's Auto Body & Towing Svc. and City of Melrose
Plaintiff:
John T Higgins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Higgins v. Peabody Properties
as 1:2019cv11928
Plaintiff:
John T. Higgins
Defendant:
Peabody Properties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Higgins v. City of Melrose et al
as 1:2019cv11557
Defendant:
Stephen's Auto Body and Towing Service and City of Melrose
Plaintiff:
John T Higgins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Higgins v. Peabody Properties
as 1:2019cv11319
Plaintiff:
John T. Higgins
Defendant:
Peabody Properties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
