Cases 1 - 10 of 472
New Hampshire Youth Movement v. David
as 1:2024cv00291
Plaintiff:
New Hampshire Youth Movement
Defendant:
David M. Scanlan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
984 Massachusetts Avenue LLC et al v. White et al
as 1:2024cv12348
Plaintiff:
Luis Gutierres, 984 Massachusetts Avenue LLC and New England Tree Masters, Inc.
Defendant:
Mark White, Michael Toups, Mark Barbadoro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00356
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Levesque v. New York State Police
as 4:2024cv40102
Plaintiff:
Andre Rene Levesque
Defendant:
New York State Police
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Collier v. Carroll, et al
as 24-1657
Defendant:
NEW HAMPSHIRE JUDICIAL CONDUCT COMMITTEE, MICHAEL GARNER, Judge and JAMES M. CARROLL, Judge
Plaintiff:
RANDALL COLLIER, Judge
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv30090
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Pecevich v. Fidler et al
as 1:2024cv11778
Defendant:
Verizon New England, Inc., Cyient, Inc., Lynne E Fidler and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph A Pecevich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Wyman v. New Era Technology, Inc.
as 1:2024cv11450
Plaintiff:
Michael Wyman
Defendant:
New Era Technology, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Pratt v. Town of Rockland et al
as 1:2024cv11360
Defendant:
Town of Rockland, George E Wattendorf, Town of Hillsborough and others
Plaintiff:
Harvey Pratt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cofield v. U.S. Postal Service et al
as 1:2024cv00121
Defendant:
PNC Bank, U.S. Postal Service, N.Y. E.B.T. and others
Plaintiff:
Rickey Cofield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
