Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Woodbridge v. The City of Greenfield
as 3:2023cv30093
Plaintiff:
Stephen D Woodbridge and Roberta Browning
Defendant:
City of Greenfield, Massachusetts and The City of Greenfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Biscan et al v. Town of Wilmington et al
as 1:2023cv11170
Plaintiff:
Roberta Biscan, CB CB, Jennifer Baptista and others
Defendant:
Town of Wilmington, Kimberly Cummings, Victoria Fitzgerald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Berge v. School Committee of Gloucester, et al
as 22-1954
Plaintiff / Appellant:
INGE BERGE
Defendant / Appellee:
SCHOOL COMMITTEE OF GLOUCESTER, BEN LUMMIS, in his personal capacity, ROBERTA A. EASON, in her personal capacity and others
Berge v. School Committee of Gloucester et al
as 1:2022cv10346
Plaintiff:
Inge Berge
Defendant:
School Committee of Gloucester, Ben Lummis, Roberta A Eason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv11686
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00393
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CARNEY et al v. HANCOCK COUNTY MAINE et al
as 1:2020cv00349
Defendant:
FRANK L SHEP ARD, AROOSTOOK MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES INC, KAYLA DUMOND and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERTA E WINCHELL, ESQ and STEW ART CARNEY, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DALTON v. KNAPP
as 1:2018cv00001
Plaintiff:
ROBERTA DALTON
Defendant:
SHARON KNAPP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Katz Vakil v. Secretary of State, Massachusetts
as 1:2017cv10315
Plaintiff:
Kora Roberta Katz Vakil
Defendant:
Secretary of State, Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
