Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Parker v. Hutnak, et al
as 23-2006
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID PARKER
Defendant / Appellee:
KIMBERLY HUTNAK, NOELLE K. CLAPHAM, as a representative of the court, and as an individual, PHYLLIS HUTNAK, as an individual and others
In Re: Parker
as 23-2005
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID PARKER, acting as guardian on behalf of R.P.
Respondent / Appellee:
KIMBERLY HUTNAK, NOELLE K. CLAPHAM, as a representative of the court, and as an individual, PHYLLIS HUTNAK, as an individual and others
Parker v. Hutnak, et al.
as 1:2023cv00378
Plaintiff:
David Parker
Defendant:
Noelle Clapham, Kimberly Hutnak, Phyllis Hutnak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mercogliano v. Foss et al
as 1:2021cv00664
Plaintiff:
Ronald Mercogliano
Defendant:
Matthew Foss, James Stone, Benjamin Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MacLeod v. Town of Hull et al
as 1:2021cv10046
Defendant:
Lou Sorgi, Sean Bannen, Town of Hull and others
Plaintiff:
Marjorie MacLeod
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv11332
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Stone v. Amazon Whole Foods Market
as 1:2018cv12609
Plaintiff:
Nanette Stone
Defendant:
Amazon Whole Foods Market
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Manes v. Parent et al
as 3:2017cv30106
Plaintiff:
Manes Pierre
Defendant:
Kristen Parent, Northeast Legal Aid, Town of Dracut and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker v. Bailey
as 1:2017cv00224
Plaintiff:
Deaven E. Tucker, Sr.
Defendant:
Nancy Bailey, William Devine, Robert McCutcheon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parham v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2016cv11468
Plaintiff:
Arthur Parham
Defendant:
Timothy J. Cruz and Kristen Stone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
