Cases 1 - 10 of 84
Anderson v. Divris
as 23-1533
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRUCE W. ANDERSON
Respondent / Appellee:
NELSON ALVES, Superintendent, M.C.I.-Norfolk and MATTHEW DIVRIS, Superintendent, M.C.I.-Norfolk
Bryan-Lever v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2023cv00180
Petitioner:
Anderson Bryan-Lever
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Anderson v. NH State Prison for Men
as 1:2022fp00518
Plaintiff:
Owan D. Anderson
Defendant:
NH State Prison for Men
Not Classified By Court:
NH Attorney General - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only) and NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Moniz
as 1:2022cv10640
Petitioner:
Craig O Anderson
Respondent:
Antone Moniz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. Hillman, et al
as 22-1256
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GERALD JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY S. HILLMAN, SIDNEY HANLON, SIDNEY KEATON-WALKER and others
Jones v. Hillman et al
as 1:2021cv11704
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Judge Timothy S. Hillman, Judge Sidney Hanlon and others
Plaintiff:
Gerald Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Moniz
as 1:2021cv11584
Petitioner:
Craig Anderson
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, Todd Lyons and Superintendent Antone Moniz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Anderson v. RI Department of Corrections
as 1:2019cv00566
Defendant:
RI Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Randy J. Anderson
Respondent:
Attorney General for the State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Anderson v. Ladoucer
as 4:2019cv40130
Petitioner:
Bruce W Anderson
Respondent:
Kristie J. Ladoucer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas v. Spaulding et al
as 1:2019cv11982
Plaintiff:
Derek Thomas
Defendant:
Scott Murray, Corey Pointer, Stephen Spaulding and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
