Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Rotondo v. Salisbury, et al
as 24-1410
Plaintiff:
GINO ROTONDO, SR.
Defendant:
WAYNE T. SALISBURY, JR., individial capacity, KIMBERLY KANE, MD, individual capacity, LORI VENTITUOLO, individual capacity and others
Rotondo v. Salisbury, et al
as 24-1358
Plaintiff:
GINO ROTONDO, SR.
Defendant:
WAYNE T. SALISBURY, JR., individial capacity, KIMBERLY KANE, individual capacity, LORI VENTITUOLO, individual capacity and others
Rotondo v. Salisbury, et al
as 24-1338
Plaintiff:
GINO ROTONDO, SR.
Defendant:
WAYNE T. SALISBURY, JR., individial capacity, KIMBERLY KANE, individual capacity, LORI VENTITUOLO, individual capacity and others
Rotondo v. Salisbury, et al
as 24-1006
Plaintiff:
GINO ROTONDO, SR.
Defendant:
WAYNE T. SALISBURY, JR., individial capacity, KIMBERLY KANE, individial capacity, LORI VENTITUOLO, individial capacity and others
Rotondo v. Salisbury et al
as 1:2023cv00458
Plaintiff:
Gino Rotondo, Sr.
Defendant:
Wayne T. Salisbury, Kimberly Kane, Lori Ventituolo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRAGG v. SHALIT et al
as 1:2022cv00267
Plaintiff:
DAVE BRAGG
Defendant:
ION SHALIT and DAVE ANDREWS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2021fp00083
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Petitioner:
Dave A. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Taylor v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2020fp00183
Petitioner:
Dave Taylor
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Nickerson v. Providence Plantation et al
as 1:2019cv00030
Defendant:
Billie-Jo Gallagher, City of Cranston, Fred Specht and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Nickerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Priestley v. Rockingham County Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2016fp00387
Defendant:
FNU Balluck, Stephen A. Church, Dave Consentino and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew L. Priestley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
