Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Leo Ewers v. State of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2023cv12102
Plaintiff:
Dale Ainsley Leo Ewers
Defendant:
State of Massachusetts, Massachusetts State Police Crime Laboratory, State Forensic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MacDonald v. Massachusetts State Police Chief, et al
as 23-1237
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KINLEY MACDONALD
Defendant / Appellee:
MASSACHUSETTS STATE POLICE, STATE POLICE OFFICER CLARK, STATE POLICE OFFICER and others
Macdonald v. Massachusetts State Police et al
as 1:2022cv12235
Plaintiff:
Kinley Macdonald
Defendant:
Chief Massachusetts State Police, State Police Officer Clark, State Police Officer John Doe 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dubois v. Alves, et al
as 22-1704
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DUBOIS
Plaintiff:
NATHANIAL DUBOIS and ASHLEY DUBOIS
Defendant / Appellee:
NELSON ALVES, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, CLAUDIA DUBOIS and others
Lewis v. Demos et al
as 1:2018cv12322
Defendant:
Massachusetts State Police, George Demos, Margaret Morris and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Edward Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stone v. Massachusetts State Police et al
as 1:2018cv10025
Plaintiff:
Stephen C. Stone
Defendant:
Massachusetts State Police and Richard Lauria
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Decarvalho v. Telford et al
as 1:2017cv11224
Plaintiff:
Janito Decarvalho
Defendant:
Erik Telford, Michael McCarthy, Carlton Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Baker et al
as 3:2017cv30021
Plaintiff:
Douglas Murphy
Defendant:
Charlie Baker, Maura Healy, Karen Polito and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
De Matos et al v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts etal
as 1:2013cv12880
Plaintiff:
Justin De Matos
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Massachusetts State Police, Scott Holland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
