Cases 11 - 20 of 2,540
Mosley v. Rhode Island Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00299
Defendant:
Wayne T. Salisbury, Jr., Rachel Bray, Rhode Island Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Mosley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Duarte v. Commonwealth of Massachusettes et al
as 1:2024cv11963
Defendant:
Superintendent Danielle Frane, LICSW Anna Dowde Hadley, TST Jake Wellpath and others
Plaintiff:
Eric J Duarte
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
WELLS FARGO BANK NA v. KANE et al
as 1:2024cv00263
Defendant:
CHELSEA KANE and DANIELLE L KANE
Plaintiff:
WELLS FARGO BANK NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv40098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Garcia et al v. McKee
as 1:2024cv00283
Defendant:
Daniel J. McKee
Plaintiff:
John Pacheco, Jr., Jose Garcia, Frank Sanchez-Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boham v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv11838
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Plaintiff:
Daniel Boham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brady v. Mosca, et al
as 24-1621
Defendant:
MARY SCHUH, SOMERSWORTH SCHOOL BOARD, PAMELA MACDONALD and others
Plaintiff:
LISA MARIE BRADY
FLOYD v. WALDO COUNTY et al
as 1:2024cv00242
Defendant:
DARRIN MOODY, WALDO COUNTY, NICK OETTINGER and others
Plaintiff:
SEAN J FLOYD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Chase v. Costlow, et al
as 24-1593
Defendant:
JOHN C. NIVISON, BANGOR, ME, FREDERICK F. COSTLOW and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL L. CHASE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00196
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
