Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-1441
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-2442
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Saez, et al v. Banco Santander Puerto Rico, et al
as 09-1876
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE SAEZ, AIDA RUTH MARTINEZ, BAYXEL SAEZ-MARTINEZ and others
Defendant - Appellee:
BANCO SANTANDER PUERTO RICO
Defendant:
SANTANDER SANTANDER NATIONAL BANK, ETC., MARSTERS REAL ESTATE, INC., RAFAEL MALDONADO and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Reyes v. Perez et al
as 3:2008cv30167
Petitioner:
Nathanael Reyes
Respondent:
Angel Perez, J Haigood and S. Buzzel
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv01612
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Saez et al v. Banco Santander Puerto Rico et al
as 3:2008cv01604
Plaintiff:
Jose Saez, Aida Ruth Martinez, Bayxel Saez-Martinez and others
Defendant:
Banco Santander Puerto Rico, Santander Bancorp, Marsters Real Estate, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cruz-Acevedo et al v. Toledo-Davila et al
as 3:2007cv02104
Plaintiff:
Luis F. Cruz-Acevedo and Manuela V. Cruz-Perocier
Defendant:
Pedro Toledo-Davila, William Orozco-Sanchez, Angel Perez-Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
