Cases 11 - 20 of 121
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Corbett v. Cummings et al
as 1:2023cv10278
Plaintiff:
James M Corbett
Defendant:
James M. Cummings, Emily Moldoff, Doctor Durfee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cummings v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2022fp00468
Petitioner:
Armani Cummings
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Dubois v. Alves, et al
as 22-1704
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DUBOIS
Plaintiff:
NATHANIAL DUBOIS and ASHLEY DUBOIS
Defendant / Appellee:
NELSON ALVES, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, CLAUDIA DUBOIS and others
GRIFFIN v. UNIVERSITY OF MAINE SYSTEM et al
as 2:2022cv00212
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA GRIFFIN
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY OF MAINE SYSTEM, UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE and GLENN CUMMINGS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boyd et al v. Lopez Vidal et al
as 3:2022cv01190
Plaintiff:
Gregory Boyd, Jonathan Lassers, GFC Holdings, LLC and others
Defendant:
Olmar Lopez Vidal, Cristina Rios Mena, Conjugal partnership Lopez-Rios and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Germain-Cummings v. Liberty University
as 4:2022cv40036
Plaintiff:
Paul Germain-Cummings
Defendant:
Liberty University
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Cummings v. Hazlewood
as 22-1087
Petitioner / Appellant:
ARMANI CUMMINGS
Respondent / Appellee:
FCI BERLIN and ROBERT HAZLEWOOD, FCI Berlin
Cummings v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2021cv00876
Petitioner:
Armani Cummings
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith v. Monteiro, et al
as 1:2021cv11281
Plaintiff:
Steven L Smith
Defendant:
Major Peter Monteiro, Lt Langston, Sheriff's Cummings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
