Cases 11 - 20 of 342
BURNHAM v. MORGAN et al
as 1:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
DILLIAN BURNHAM
Defendant:
ANDREW MORGAN, ETHAN WHITNEY, FRANKLIN DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Sullivan v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2023cv13151
Plaintiff:
Timothy Franklin Sullivan
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Watson v. Hodge et al
as 1:2023cv12909
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Donald Watson
Defendant:
Jascha Franklin Hodge, Boston Transportation Dept. and City Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Harris v. FRANKLIN MINT FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
as 1:2023cv12891
Plaintiff:
Michael Harris
Defendant:
Franklin Mint Federal Credit Union
THOMPSON v. FRANKLIN MINT FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
as 1:2023cv12885
Plaintiff:
TINA THOMPSON
Defendant:
Franklin Mint Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
BROWN v. FRANKLIN MINT FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
as 1:2023cv12894
Plaintiff:
Steven Brown
Defendant:
Franklin Mint Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1715
BRONSON v. FRANKLIN MINT FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
as 1:2023cv12893
Plaintiff:
Tanya Bronson
Defendant:
Franklin Mint Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ramos-Gutierrez v. Garland
as 23-1885
Petitioner:
FRANKLIN RAMOS-GUTIERREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Rounds v. U.S. Department of Justice, et al
as 23-1789
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IRVING FRANKLIN ROUNDS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, RICHARD CIRUOLO, Agent, Department of Justice and JOHN COUGHLIN, Agent, Department of Justice
MCELLIGOTT v. DAY et al
as 1:2023cv00348
Plaintiff:
CASEY MCELLIGOTT
Defendant:
JACOB DAY, LUKE GROSS and FRANKLIN JENNINGS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
