Cases 11 - 20 of 338
BRONSON v. FRANKLIN MINT FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
as 1:2023cv12893
Plaintiff:
Tanya Bronson
Defendant:
Franklin Mint Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
THOMPSON v. FRANKLIN MINT FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
as 1:2023cv12885
Plaintiff:
TINA THOMPSON
Defendant:
Franklin Mint Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
BROWN v. FRANKLIN MINT FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
as 1:2023cv12894
Plaintiff:
Steven Brown
Defendant:
Franklin Mint Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1715
Ramos-Gutierrez v. Garland
as 23-1885
Petitioner:
FRANKLIN RAMOS-GUTIERREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Rounds v. U.S. Department of Justice, et al
as 23-1789
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IRVING FRANKLIN ROUNDS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, RICHARD CIRUOLO, Agent, Department of Justice and JOHN COUGHLIN, Agent, Department of Justice
MCELLIGOTT v. DAY et al
as 1:2023cv00348
Plaintiff:
CASEY MCELLIGOTT
Defendant:
JACOB DAY, LUKE GROSS and FRANKLIN JENNINGS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2023cv12000
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Neal Franklin
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00224
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Marshall v. Sununu et al
as 1:2023fp00228
Plaintiff:
Krystal Marshall
Defendant:
Christopher Sununu, Judd Gregg, Pembroke Academy High School and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
