Cases 11 - 20 of 73
Mirabal-Pargas et al v. DCF Exchange, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv01544
Plaintiff:
Carlos Mirabal-Pargas, Aida Mirabal-Delgado and Conjugal Partnership Mirabal-Mirabal
Defendant:
DCF Exchange, LLC, Nathaniel M. Pulsifier, Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
US v. Cardozo
as 21-1779
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
BYRON ALLAN CARDOZO
Interested Party:
JANE DOE 1, JANE DOE 2, JANE DOE 3 and others
Ortiz-Sanchez et al v. Steidel-Figueroa et al
as 3:2021cv01433
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe, Jane 1 Doe and Maritza Ortiz-Sanchez
Defendant:
Sigfrido Steidel-Figueroa, Damaris Colon, Rowina Rosa-Pimentel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hernandez-Rivera v. Metro Santurce, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv01640
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe 3, ABC Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Dr. Ladys N. Hernandez-Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US v. Cardozo
as 20-1398
Interested Party:
JANE DOE 3, JANE DOE 2, JANE DOE 1 and others
Defendant / Appellant:
BYRON ALLAN CARDOZO
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
US v. Cardozo
as 20-1318
Interested Party:
JANE DOE 3, JANE DOE 2, JANE DOE 1 and others
Defendant / Appellant:
BYRON ALLAN CARDOZO
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv10279
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Puerto Rico Telephone Company v. Ayala-Rivera, et al
as 19-1718
Defendant / Appellant:
CONJUGAL PARTNERSHIP AYALA-ROSADO, XIOMARA ROSADO-CARTAGENA, INGRID RAMOS-MATOS and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PUERTO RICO TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC., d/b/a Claro
Defendant:
JANE DOE 1
Hickey v. Thompkins et al
as 1:2019cv11349
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Naphcare Medical Department, Jane Doe # 7 and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hickey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv11829
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
