Cases 11 - 20 of 175
Russo v. DaSilva et al
as 1:2022cv10504
Plaintiff:
Richard R Russo
Defendant:
Bryan DaSilva, Patrick Johnston, John Cristiano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brody v. Medway, Town of et al
as 1:2021cv11799
Plaintiff:
Steven Brody
Defendant:
Town of Medway, Maryjane White, Dennis Crowley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Russo v. Valmet, Inc., et al
as 21-1848
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL RUSSO
Defendant / Appellee:
VALMET, INC., a Delaware Corporation with a place of business in Duluth, Georgia and VALMET, INC. DEFINED BENEFIT PLAN
Russo v. New England Regional Council of Carpenters
as 21-1725
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL RUSSO
Defendant / Appellee:
NEW ENGLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS
Piccione v. MarineMax Northeast, LLC
as 1:2021cv11414
Defendant:
MarineMax Northeast, LLC and Russo Marine
Plaintiff:
John P Piccione
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00703
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Ryan v. DeMaria et al
as 1:2021cv11158
Plaintiff:
James P. Ryan
Defendant:
Carlo DeMara, Jr., Jamie Russo, Atty Debra J. Breton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Capitol Specialty Insurance Corporation v. Dello Russo Enterprises, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv10939
Plaintiff:
Capitol Specialty Insurance Corporation
Defendant:
Michael Dello Russo, Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Subscribing to Policy No. XSZ123342 and Dello Russo Enterprises, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Bassett v Blitt
as 1:2021cv10899
Defendant:
Cameron Rose doing business as Colton Grey, John Doe #14 doing business as Magdeline St. Michaels, Vivid Canada Entertainment, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Leah Bassett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Young v. Russo et al
as 1:2021cv00183
Defendant:
Mark Russo and Arthur S. Russo, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Rasharn Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
