Cases 21 - 30 of 41
Floyd v. Jarvis
as 1:2014cv14419
Petitioner:
David Floyd
Respondent:
Joseph Jarvis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jarvis, et al v. Village Gun Shop, Inc.
as 14-2249
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUSSELL JARVIS, JAMES JARVIS, ROBERT CRAMPTON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MARY ELIZABETH HEFFERNAN, in her Official Capacity as Secretary of the Executive Office of Public Safety and Security and VILLAGE GUN SHOP, INC., d/b/a Village Vault
JARVIS v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 2:2014cv00511
Plaintiff:
LISA M JARVIS
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Floyd v. Jarvis
as 1:2014cv14109
Petitioner:
David Floyd
Respondent:
Joseph Jarvis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sirois v. L'Heureux et al
as 1:2014cv00472
Plaintiff:
David Sirois
Defendant:
Joanna L'Heureux , Antonio Pires , Donti Rosciti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pereira v. Jarvis
as 1:2014cv13813
Petitioner:
Justin Pereira
Respondent:
Joseph Jarvis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Shepard v. Jarvis et al
as 1:2014cv00253
Plaintiff:
Joseph Shepard
Defendant:
I.S.C. C/O Jarvis, I.S.C. C/O Walker and I.S.C. C/O Lombardie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wynn v. Fresenius USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv11608
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Wynn
Defendant:
Fresenius USA, Inc., Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc., Fresenius USA Marketing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
K. v. Pentucket Regional School District School Committee et al
as 1:2014cv10071
Plaintiff:
Michelle K.
Defendant:
Pentucket Regional School District School Committee, Jeffrey Mulqueen, Michael Jarvis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Grover v. Fresenius USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv12471
Defendant:
Fresenius U.S.A., Inc. , Fresenius USA Marketing, Inc. , Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Tashia Jarvis Grover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
