Cases 21 - 30 of 641
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Smith v. Alves
as 1:2024cv10124
Petitioner:
Craig Smith
Respondent:
Nelson Alves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nelson et al v. Autonomous Municipality of San Juan
as 3:2023cv01620
Plaintiff:
Robert Nelson, Warren Nelson, Wendy Nelson and others
Defendant:
Autonomous Municipality of San Juan, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Perry v. Alves
as 1:2023cv13028
Petitioner:
Frederick Perry
Respondent:
Nelson B Alves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marie N. v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv00516
Plaintiff:
Marie Nelson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
US v. Omoruyi
as 23-1957
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
OSARETIN GODSPOWER OMORUYI, a/k/a Bright Nelson, a/k/a Nelson Bright
Interested Party:
TD BANK NA, CITIZENS BANK, N.A., BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and others
Nelson et al v. Select Portfolio Servicing et al
as 4:2023cv40155
Plaintiff:
Matthew E. Nelson and Samantha Adams
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, as Trustee for the Benefit of the Freddie Mac Seasoned Loans Structured Transaction Trust, Series 2019-2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Santiago-Colon v. US
as 23-1912
Petitioner / Appellant:
NELSON SANTIAGO-COLON
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
McCurley v. Garcia
as 3:2023cv01520
Plaintiff:
Matthew Ryan McCurley
Defendant:
Nelson Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lees v. Alves
as 23-1824
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRIAN LEES, a/k/a Brian Lee
Respondent / Appellee:
NELSON ALVES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
